International law expert: New Zealand made a terrible mistake at the UN.

credit: New York Times.

Professor Alan Dershowitz needs little introduction in legal circles.  A preeminent civil-liberties and constitutional lawyer and recently-retired Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, he has also been described as “the best-known criminal lawyer in the world” after taking on a string of high-profile cases.

Professor Dershowitz was in New Zealand in January and  gave a talk to a large audience at the University of Auckland Business School, sponsored by the law firm Minter, Ellison, Rudd, Watts along with the Raye Freedman Trust.

In a Q&A session chaired by local constitutional law expert and former New Zealand Prime Minister, Sir Geoffrey Palmer, Professor Dershowitz covered a range of topics that included the US constitution and legal challenges to President Trump, current threats to free speech and the erosion of civil discourse between increasingly polarised political camps.

While warmly complimentary about New Zealand’s history of tolerance, Professor Dershowitz castigated New Zealand for making a critical error in its support for UN Resolution 2334 in December 2016, saying:

“This country made a terrible mistake by voting for a United Nations resolution that said that the Western Wall of Jerusalem, the Hebrew University, the Hadassah Hospital, the Jewish Quarter [of the Old City of Jerusalem], were all illegally occupied territory”.

Professor Dershowitz characterised the US’s failure to exercise its veto as former President Barack Obama’s attempt to “get revenge on Binyamin Netanyahu”, which led directly to President Trump’s decision to recognise Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

“It was a thoughtless, foolish, bigoted Security Council resolution and it is what led to President Trump deciding to recognise Jerusalem as the capital of Israel because he had to level the playing field.  We couldn’t have peace if these places, historically Jewish, are regarded as occupied territory.  You can’t trade land for peace if it’s illegal for Israel to hold on to the Western Wall, because how much would Israel be giving up to get the wall in any negotiation?  It would be extortion, not negotiation.”

Also coming under fire from Dershowitz, was the anti-Israel BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions) campaign, proponents of which persuaded the New Zealand singer Lorde to cancel her concert in Israel.  BDS, according to Professor Dershowitz, is “a terrible, terrible movement”: If BDS were a legitimate movement, Professor Dershowitz explained, it would list every country in the world in order of two criteria; their human rights and the access of victims of human rights to justice and the media.  They would then start their boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign against the worst offenders. Professor Dershowitz argued,

“By those criteria, Israel would be about 196th on the list out of about 230/240 countries.  But it’s now not only first on the list, it’s the only country on the list.”

“For me, discriminating against Israel or against only one country, the nation state of the Jewish people, Israeli academics, saying you won’t work with them – I don’t see how that’s different from the baker in the US who wouldn’t bake a cake for a gay couple, or a landowner who won’t rent to a black couple…it’s just wrong, it’s discrimination”. 

“BDS is not a protest against Israel’s policies, it is a protest against the very existence of Israel as the nation state of the Jewish people”.

On the topic of Lorde’s cancellation of her Tel Aviv show as a result of pressure from local BDS activists, Professor Dershowitz said that, while he said he did not wish to criticise or condemn Lorde;

“ I don’t think she had any idea of what she was doing.  I think she ought to go to Israel to judge for herself”.

Shalom.Kiwi’s contributors are a mix of Māori, Pakeha, Jewish and non-Jewish New Zealanders, who have all spent considerable time in Israel.

Check Also

The Rise of Australia’s Activist Far Right. How Far Will It Go?

Not long ago, the activist far right comprised a motley assortment of anti-Islam groups and …

One comment

  1. Leon Poddebsky

    New Zealand’s vote was a hostile premeditated act, not “an error.”
    The Australian Labor Party’s determination to “recognise” the ‘Palestinian’ state”, likewise was an act of premeditated hostility.

Love to hear your opinion, however given name & surname are required. Email addresses are not published.