The Rise of Australia’s Activist Far Right. How Far Will It Go?

United Patriots Front. credit: Squarespace.

Not long ago, the activist far right comprised a motley assortment of anti-Islam groups and individuals rallying in cities across Australia railing against Islamist terrorism, Muslim immigration and the Islamisation of Australia.

Today, the activist far right scene has been sharpened and galvanised into something much bolder, more militant and potentially threatening to Australian society.

Within Australia, the far right contains a wide diversity of views, and is composed of a multitude of groups of varying sizes and aims.  Many tend to be active predominantly online or within-house, rather than publicly on the streets.

Out of this melange, three main political streams of thought have emerged in the contemporary activist far right in Australia.  These streams may be described as civic “patriots,” nationalists and racialists.

These streams define themselves according to their own idiosyncratic ideas about identity, about who “qualifies” as an Australian and what constitutes the ideal demographic make-up of Australian society. Notions of race and culture, multiculturalism and integration, are pivotal in these streams.

There is some overlap in their beliefs, some membership exchange, and at times a great deal of hostility between them.  A brief summary of the underlying ideas and modus operandi of the groups in each stream follows.

Civic Patriotism

This stream is closest to mainstream Australian views, except that it is overtly and implacably anti-Islam. Civic patriotism emphasises allegiance to the secular state, state institutions and civic values, with the overriding belief that citizenship is the primary determinant of group identity rather than race, ethnicity or religion.

Adherents of this stream believe that non-Europeans and non-Christians may immigrate to Australia on the proviso that they assimilate into “Australian” culture.  In short, civic patriots believe in culture over race, in the secular state over religion, and in citizenship.  However, they consider that observant Muslims are unable to assimilate, and that they act as a fifth column (with collusion from the political left) and aim to Islamise Australia.  This is the basis of the opposition by these far-right groups to Islam and Muslims.

Civic patriots hold other related views which are likely shared by a much broader amorphous group of Australians who nevertheless do not subscribe to the civic patriots’ policies of banning Muslim immigration or overtly polemicising against Islam, or who are repelled by the neo-Nazis who have been known to have promoted and attended rallies and other events organised by groups in this stream.

These related views include a conception of Islam as a supremacist, totalitarian and imperialist ideology, oppressive of non-Muslims, which aims at world domination, comparable to pre-modern Christianity.  A corollary of this view is sympathy for Jews, who are seen as a favoured target of Islamist terrorists, and for Israel, based on the belief that Israel, a tiny non-Muslim enclave in the Islamic dominated Middle East, is at the front line of freedom for Western civilisation.  The belief is that if Israel falls to the Muslims, then domino-style, Europe too will be swept up in the Muslim avalanche and lost to indigenous Europeans.

Civic patriots are also not alone in focusing on what they perceive as the oppressive nature of Islam towards women, homosexuals and non-Muslims, and on Islamist terrorism, female genital mutilation, child brides, alleged higher crime rates and other negative characterisations of Muslims as a group, but they do so more publicly and stridently than others.

Examples of groups and parties falling within the civic patriotism model are Party For Freedom (led by Nick Folkes), the Rise Up Australia Party (led by Pastor Danny Nalliah) and Reclaim Australia.  Not all of the supporters of this stream have European backgrounds – for example, Nalliah is a Sri Lankan migrant to Australia, Folkes is married to an Asian woman, and some supporters are ethnic Chinese.

Nationalists

The second stream on the far right defines itself primarily – at least, publicly – as anti-Islam, but holds Jews also to be responsible for Muslim immigration and considers Jews to be a major threat to Western society. Muslims are the immediate target; Jews are marked for targeting at a later time.  Nationalists prioritise race and ethnicity over citizenship as the prime determinant of identity.  This view subordinates the state to the service of the nation (which is to say, the majority racial or ethnic group), and prioritises the continued existence and self-identification of a particular race. As expressed by the group Nationalist Alternative,

“Our struggle is not to safeguard the state, but to safeguard the nation.”

Nationalists, like Civic Patriots, are actively anti-Islam/Muslim.  Both groups, for example, engage in protests against development applications for mosques.  Although the Nationalist focus is primarily against Muslims, Nationalist groups also oppose other minority groups, although this is less publicly visible.

The Nationalist model is exemplified by the United Patriots Front (UPF) and its leader Blair Cottrell.  In a Facebook message discussion between Blair Cottrell and another Nationalist, Neil Erikson, in February 2016 on the future direction of the UPF, Erikson advised:

“My personal opinion is stick to the Muslim shit and Cultural Marxism for max support do Jews later you don’t need to show your full hand.”

Cottrell responded:

“Yeah good advice and that’s my current attitude as well. It will take years to prepare people for the Jewish problem.  If any of us came out with it now we would be slaughtered by public opinion.”

Racialists

For the third stream, race, not culture or religion or even nationality, is seen as the primary determinant of identity.  The long-discredited pseudo-science of social Darwinism is relied on to rank races (itself an ill-defined concept) in a hierarchy according to their supposed physical, moral and intellectual fitness. Racialists are hostile to all people they consider to be non-Europeans, but Jews are seen as the primary enemy.

Yet, in contrast to followers of the other two streams, racialists are not necessarily anti-Islam or anti-Muslim.  This might seem paradoxical but it reflects the World War II alliance between Nazi Germany and certain Muslim leaders, most notably the Palestinian Arab leader Haj Amin al-Husseini.

The racialist stream is on the outermost fringes of the political spectrum, and consists primarily of neo-Nazis, and others driven by ideas of white supremacy and antisemitism.  Their racialism is typically accompanied by belief in antisemitic conspiracy theories.  Jews as a group are portrayed as somehow controlling the mechanisms of power in the world – banking, government, media – to the utter detriment of the European races.  Part of this mindset is the conviction that “the Jews,” along with other non-whites and leftists, are plotting “White Genocide” through mass immigration of non-whites into white majority countries.

Antipodean Resistance, a neo-Nazi group, typifies this third model.  Unashamedly neo-Nazi, with its antisemitic, anti-homosexual and anti-non-white immigration stance, it is a small but highly active group. It models itself on National Action in the UK (a proscribed terrorist organisation) and the Nordic Resistance Movement in Scandinavia, some of whose members have been convicted of carrying out bombing attacks.  There are quite a few other established racialist groups in Australia but these have not generally been so publicly active over the last few years.

‘Reclaim Australia’ credit: Daily Star.

In contrast, a plethora of civic patriot and nationalist groups have been active over the last several years. This activism is often in the form of public protests, such as the anti-Muslim Reclaim Australia protests throughout the major cities in 2015, anti-mosque protests in Bendigo and elsewhere, and other anti-Muslim events.  Many of the protests in Melbourne were violent, with scuffles between supporters of the far right and far left.  In Sydney, the nationalists and socialists were kept far apart by police, and hence there was virtually no violence.

Of note is the hard-left response to the far right. Antifa (short for “anti-fascist”) is a collective term for streetwise anarchists and socialists who engage in “direct action.”  Many of them look for inspiration to iconic anti-fascist historical events, such as the Battle of Cable Street (1936) in London and the Spanish Civil War (1936-39).

In a reversal of roles, it is now Antifa activists who promote violence through such memes as “Punch a Nazi,” and who encourage physical violence against anyone they deem to be a fascist or Nazi, whether they are or not. The Antifa socialists see themselves as mounting the barricades in glorious defence of Islam and Muslims, mosque and burqa, and against the far-right bogans and bigots.  Both groups typically spoil for a physical fight with each other.

Emboldening the Far Right

Lessons for Jews From Charlottesville. credit: Algemeiner

Events overseas, especially the election of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency in November 2016, have given the far right a sense that things are turning in their direction.  They are becoming increasingly emboldened, as was seen in the United States in the August 2017 “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, where a conglomeration of far right groups across the United States converged, marched and rallied. The far right marched to chants of

“Jews will not replace us”

and held placards with the words

“the Jewish media is going down”

and

“Jews are Satan’s children.”

Armed far right militia men stood threateningly outside the Charlottesville synagogue as the praying Jews inside held their regular Sabbath morning service.  And a far-right activist drove his vehicle into a group of left wing protesters, killing one and injuring many others.

In Australia, these events coincided with the rise of an extreme hard-core activist group, Antipodean Resistance, heralding a new stage in far-right activity in Australia. Antipodean Resistance promotes and incites hatred and violence, as seen through some of its anti-Jewish and anti-homosexual posters, with graphic images of shooting Jews and homosexuals in the head.  One poster called to “Legalise the execution of Jews.”  Other posters urged homosexuals to commit suicide; one of these was during the same sex marriage debate.

Meanwhile, three leaders from the nationalist camp (Blair Cottrell, Christopher Shortis and Neil Erikson) were convicted and fined in September 2017 for inciting serious vilification of Muslims through their stunt of beheading a mannequin with a toy sword outside the Bendigo Council offices in 2015.  The civic patriots and nationalists have somewhat quietened, for now, perhaps as they regroup or splinter further.

It remains to be seen where the far right, especially the racialists, will go in 2018.  Will the racialists eclipse the patriots and nationalists, forcing them to move further to the right to maintain a public profile, street credibility and political dynamism, or will the reverse happen with the racialists being seen as too extreme, and being marginalised and rejected within the far right?  Time will tell.

An emboldened and activist far right threatens Australia’s successful multicultural society.  The targeting of Jews, homosexuals, Muslims and non-white immigrants, starts with vilification and demonisation, propaganda and lies.  If the aspirations and plans of groups like Antipodean Resistance come to fruition, there will be blood in the streets across Australian cities.

It is time that Australian leaders in politics, media, law enforcement, and elsewhere, address the social dislocation and the ideologies that are often a spur to extremism, whether on the political right or left, or within religious communities.  The time to act is now.

Julie Nathan is the Research Officer for the Executive Council of Australian Jewry and the author of its annual Report on Antisemitism in Australia.

Check Also

Happy Australia Day.

January 26 – Australia Day, is the day we celebrate the birth of our great …

3 comments

  1. Obviously the author of this article; Ms Julie Nathan, is a dyed in the wool Socialist, come bright eyed ‘fellow traveller’ of all things that resemble a hammer and sickle. It can be only be hoped that our intel and security people have Ms Nathan on a very tight ‘need to watch’ listing.

    While Ms Nathan is very loose with the truth…in describing herself as a ‘Research Officer’, she should remember that a lot; the bulk of those people, she so effortlessly describes as of the ‘Far Right’ are no more than decent Australians…doing no more than a lot of what she is imploring her own Commo mates to do…ACTING NOW, IN DEFENCE OF OUR COUNTRY – AUSTRALIA!!!

    Ms Nathan could not cite one name from the leadership of Reclaim Australia….nor Antifa for that mater….clearly indicative of her ignorance of this subject overall, beyond what is readily available through everyday news segments. Says a lot for her claiming to be a Researcher!

    For myself, I grown to know dozens of decent people through the Reclaim movement….people I now feel fortunate to call friends. Reclaim is about Immigration Ms Nathan…something I have not heard any socialists/commo’s concerning themselves with….beyond opening the flood gates to allow every other ‘economic migrant’ through with break neck speed!

    Finally Ms Nathan….the Barcelona Anarchists were nothing to do with Spain’s Communists during the Spanish Civil War….beyond other than trying to slaughter each other the closer Franco’s Army got to Barcelona. Just like now, a wide collection of varying interest groups.

    Do your self and this country a favour Ms Nathan, hit the streets and try protecting this country from your ‘fellow travelling’ commo mates….rather than sitting in an Office sprouting lies and unfounded garbage…..(I’ll look to see you at the next Reclaim Rally Ms Nathan…..for the odd second or two.)

  2. Larry Langman

    Ms Nathan’s article is both timely and relevant to the ongoing discussion of the general rise in antisemitism we are seeing in western societies. For most of us whose parents went through the second world war or experienced the repressive nature of Eastern Europe of the last century, the idea of acts in the name of “national purity” send alarm bells that cannot and should not be ignored. It is of equal concern that that call to national purity purity is Islamic or Australian.

    I feel Ms Nathan’s classification of Civic Patriots, Nationalists and Racialists is an accurate taxonomy for the orientation of these groups and the discussion of their alignment one with each other is both useful and important to a better understanding of how they might evolve over the coming years.

    Ms Nathan rightly I think draws our attention to the “emboldened” nature of both the alt-right and alt-left and suggests that this can never be good for the Jews. Rightly said!

    I think that Julie Nathan also echos that famous quote of Pastor Martin Niemoller “First they came…..”.

    We all have a duty to ensure that when they come for us….there are enough to stand for us.

    Congratulations on a well researched piece.

Love to hear your opinion, however given name & surname are required. Email addresses are not published.