The True Nakba of the New Palestinians.

The Arabs who now call themselves Palestinians consider the Nakba as a pivotal event in their history. Nakba refers to the trauma of the failure of the mighty Arab nation to wipe out this little blotch on the map called Israel.  We Jews had the gall to come home and rebuild our ancestral indigenous homeland on a place the colonizing Arabs still wanted for themselves. Prof. Gabriel Motzkin, director of the Van Leer Institute, as sympathetic as he is to the “Palestinian” cause, is quoted as having said:

“. . . the Palestinians didn’t exist before the Nakba, they came into being because of what was a traumatic event for them.”

This flies in the face of the propaganda the so-called “Palestinians” are broadcasting around the globe, arguing that they comprise the indigenous nation in the land, pre-dating the Jews.  Some, such as Saeb Erekat, even raise the ridiculous claim that the “Palestinians” are, in fact, the original Canaanites and that his ancestors inhabited the oldest city in the world – Jericho – 9000 years ago.  There is no record of Canaanites for the past 3000 years, but historical evidence, or lack thereof, has never prevented the “Palestinians” from periodically weaving ever new fabrics of lies to present as if it is historical fact.

History shows that the Arabs (including the likes of Erekat’s family) originated from the Arabian Peninsula. Strange coincidence, eh?  Arabs – Arabia. Go figure!

This same history shows that the Arabs invaded surrounding countries, pillaging and plundering as they went, taking slaves, killing those who refused to convert to Islam or to accept jizya status.  That history means that the Arabs in the land that later fell under the British Mandate of Palestine were actually conquerors and colonialists and they arrived here in the 7th century CE, long after the Jews had already established their kingdoms between episodes of being overcome and dispersed.  Today’s Israel is only one in a series of Jewish independent states on the land in which our national identity was forged.

The Jews, therefore, are the oldest living population that had sovereignty over the land.  Even in dispersal we maintained our language in prayer, our traditions and spiritual life, our ties to the homeland to which we longed to return.  Jews over historical time have also been called Israelites and Hebrews: Jew-Judea, Israelite-Israel, Hebrew-our indigenous language.  Makes sense, no?

So we see that in typical conqueror-colonialist fashion, the Arabs are trying to rewrite history to suit their need to dominate and wrest this land from us once more.  They have not succeeded militarily and now they are crying “foul” and trying to do it with diplomatic, political and propaganda manipulations.  They have also convinced themselves that they are the victims here.

The ironic part of this whole story is that the pan-Arab nation, itself, created a new entity for its pawns – the New Palestinians, let us call them.  I find it hard to deny that the Arabs who were here in 1948 have since come to view themselves as a people apart from the larger Arab People.  Much as I might not like that fact, there is now a Palestinian Arab identity separate from the Arab nation from which they sprung. (It is not clear, however, how sustainable that identity would be if Israel were, in fact, to fall.)
Much to their misfortune, however, they have adopted the twisted stories and accepted the victim status endowed to them by the domineering and manipulative shenanigans of those who have been exploiting them from the start, blaming Israel for all that has gone wrong.  When will they wake up to their true history and collectively identify their true oppressors?

They were goaded into joining the war against the Jews in 1947-8, refused full integration into Jordanian society in spite of many of them being Jordanian citizens, and forced to waste away in refugee camps in other Arab countries, robbed of their human dignity.  All this for the promise of wiping out us Jews. I wonder if the loss of a future for their kids is worth all the moaning over a past they cannot change and which they insist on perpetuating.

I am curious about the psychology of a people that is willing to call itself by a name they used to detest as it was what their enemy the Jews were called. How humiliating is that!

I wonder about a people that is willing to define itself from the get-go as a failure:  The Nakba as their defining event of nationhood means that failure and trauma is what they have decided to define themselves by.  In contrast, the expulsion from Spain, the Holocaust and the ethnic cleansing from Arab countries do not define us Jews.  We were a nation long before these tragedies. We have a history with ups and downs, with successes and failures, with heroes and villains.

Are the New Palestinians ready to re-evaluate what defines them?  Do they really want terrorists to be their heroes?  Do they want victim-hood to be their badge?  Do they not want scientists, doctors, innovators and artists, for example, to be the face they present to the world?

If the New Palestinians decide to stay stuck, unlike their namesake, then they are not able to partner with Israel as it strives onward toward a better future world.  That future world is not suited to victims who glorify being the underdog while begging the other nations around the globe to beat up their big brother for them.

I wonder if, generations from now, the New Palestinians will be brave enough to face the truth – that those guilty of their oppression have been their fellow Arabs.  Those responsible for putting stones and knives in their hands instead of the tools for earning a living are their fellow Arabs. Those who fill their kids’ heads with dreams of jihad instead of dreams of a worthwhile profession are their fellow Arabs.

As long as the Arabs who now call themselves Palestinians buy into the myth that Israel is their enemy they remain complicit in their own continuing exploitation at the hands of their fellow Arabs.  That is their true Nakba.

==============

Sheri Oz is a retired psychotherapist living in Israel for 38 years. Always interested in politics and international affairs, she now has time to study and write about it to her heart’s satisfaction. She often writes on her own site, Israel Diaries.

Check Also

The Jews of Nasser, a record of post 1967 imprisonment of Jews in Egypt.

In the memory of June 5th 1967, some recall defeat others celebrate victory, but very …

4 comments

  1. dwaraka_thathachari@yahoo.com

    The first principle in law of jungle is might is right. The Muslims think that their law, sharia is above all laws (human made) and think that THEIR MIGHT is always right. The adage is everything is fair in love and war.But the Muslims were not taught to love, which requires the following of live and let live.They were taught to always fight. For them end result is important than the methodology they have adopted to achieve it. Hence they will claim victimhood in a free society to achieve their goal.

  2. ‘Palestinianism’ is a delusional manifestation of the Arab addiction to “The Jews Ate My Homework” [http://www.israellycool.com/2014/07/15/reader-post-understanding-pfalestinian-behavior-as-addiction/]

  3. Sheri Oz has written a very interesting piece. She mourns the “New Palestinians” caught in their victimhood. She mourns a people who self define themselves as the victims of the Nakbah. She mourns a people rejected by brother Arab states. A people who at their birth in 1948 were failed by Egypt, Jordan Syria and Lebanon. Indeed totally rejected by the entire Arab League. This is a state of affairs that I feel the “New Palestinians” are still unable to come to terms with.

    Sheri Oz in her analysis fails to identify the central problem. The only history this people can claim with any degree of legitimacy is the Nakbah. The only cultural history this people can identify with is their history of the past 67 years and they are years of suffering at the hands of their arab brothers. Hardly a cultural and temporal history upon which to build a strong sense of self.

    Prior to 1917, can anyone name a Palestinian Novelist, Scientist, Doctor,Teacher, Preacher, Law Giver, Composer, Artist, Historian, Dancer, Philosopher or Leader who identified themselves as such or indeed part of a proud cultural history. Can anyone tell me of the Museum that traces the cultural history of this people. The only legitimate history of this people is after 1948 or if one adds their nascency 1930.

    Sheri compares the aspiration of of this new people with that of the jewish people with our “ups and downs”. That is wholly unreasonable. The jewish people can name figures of note through 3000 years of continues cultural identity. a citizen of Ramallah cannot.

    That is the real issue that Sheri should be talking about. Born in and of the Nakbah. A people without a culture or heritage other than as victims of their Arab brothers.

    This is the true tragedy of the “New Palestinian”. And Israel can do nothing about that.

    • Thank-you, Larry Langman, for a very eloquent expansion on my piece. What you write is, of course, all true. I think you ideas complement my own and together make a whole story. Israel can do nothing about the whole and complete true tragedy of the “New Palestinian”.