F’mer Min.Demands Uni takes action anti-Israel Protesters

Former ALP Minister for Higher Education Excoriates “Repulsive” Anti-Israel Protesters, Demands University Take Disciplinary Action.

Sent: Friday, 13 March 2015. 4:03 PM.

To: ‘vice.chancellor@sydney.edu.au’
Subject: Violent disruption of Kemp talk

Dear Dr Spence,

On Wednesday 11 March I attended a meeting at Sydney University that was addressed by Colonel Richard Kemp, the former commander of UK forces in Afghanistan.  Colonel Kemp was scheduled to speak about the ethical dilemmas that face military forces confronted by non-state adversaries, especially those that deliberately conduct their operations in close proximity to civilian populations with the goal of gaining propaganda advantage from the inevitable casualties.  He was in Israel during the Gaza conflict of July-August last year.  He stated at the time that he was impressed by the IDF’s measures to minimize Palestinian civilian casualties and that he had difficulty envisaging what more they could do to this end given the reality of military operations.

By way of background, I am a former politician: the Labor MP for the seat of Sydney for fifteen years, and a member of the federal ministry for six years.  For three of those years (1990-93) I was the Minister for Higher Education.  During that period I visited a great many campuses and was, more than once, the target of student protest demonstrations.

But I never experienced anything quite as repulsive as what I witnessed last Wednesday, partly captured in this YouTube video.

I learned about the meeting from an email flyer forwarded by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, though I understand the meeting was sponsored by the Australian Union of Jewish Students.  The gathering was attended by a varied audience of students and others, including one other former parliamentary colleague.

When I arrived at the meeting there was a group at the door handing out leaflets supporting the BDS campaign against Israel.  After Colonel Kemp had spoken for about twenty minutes there was a kerfuffle and around 15-20 people forced their way in led by a young woman who repeatedly screeched “Richard Kemp supports genocide” into a megaphone that was set to maximum volume.  The group chanted continuously and defied the (very restrained) efforts of the security guards to evict them.  They clearly intended to disrupt the meeting to the point where it could not continue.  It was only after a concerted effort by the security people, with the protestors resisting violently, that the talk could be resumed.  This was a truly frightening episode.  At one point the lights went out, leading people to wonder what might come next.

In amongst the robotic chanting a few things stood out. The screeching young woman can be clearly heard expressing sympathy for the extremist organisation Hitz ut-Tahrir, whose Australian spokesman gained notoriety last year for refusing (on ABC Lateline) to condemn the tactics of Islamic State (beheadings, crucifixions, incinerations, selling women into slavery).  When one of the protestors was accused of fascistic behaviour, he responded “we are not fascists, we’re Marxist-Leninists” – another totalitarian ideology responsible for tens of millions of deaths.

The disruptors tried to suppress the views of Colonel Kemp, who gave a lucid and well-reasoned account of the moral issues in this kind of conflict in the limited time he had available, yet insist on the right of Hitz ut-Tahrir to spout their genocidal ideology, a sample of which was reported in today’s Australian newspaper:

THE top Australian cleric of extremist Islamic group Hizb ut-Tahrir has ramped up his hate speech in a rant referring to Jews as “the most evil creature of Allah” who have “corrupted the world” and will “pay for blood with blood”.

In the latest tirade to surface, cleric Ismail al-Wahwah — representing an organisation whose stated aim is to take over the world — said recognising Jews constituted the “epitome of evil” because that would “strengthen the cancerous entity”.

This, apparently, is acceptable speech to these champions of the ‘left’ – a striking confirmation of the old trope about extremes of Left and Right meeting at some point. The group primarily responsible for this outrage, a Trotskyist group calling itself the ‘Socialist Alternative’, has a record of this kind of thing at your university (this incident for example).

It seems you have active at your university a bunch of totalitarians who think they have a right of veto on the expression of views they disapprove of, and who will try to enforce this veto by violent disruption. The effect this will have on the free exchange of ideas is obvious. Potential speakers will think twice about the prospect of being subjected to this kind of thing. The expression of certain viewpoints will quietly disappear from campuses and students will increasingly inhabit an intellectual monoculture in which only approved opinions are sayable.

According to one Jewish student who I communicated with today the climate at Sydney University is becoming increasingly poisonous and fearful for identifiably Jewish students, especially those who have the temerity to defend Israel.

Do you agree with me, Dr Spence, that these are deeply sinister developments? Do you accept that an institution where such behaviour is tolerated has ceased, in one crucial respect, to deserve to be called a University?

More to the point, will you:

· Unequivocally condemn this behaviour and make clear it will not be tolerated in future
· Take steps to ensure the perpetrators are dealt with under university disciplinary procedures
· Commit to restoring a genuine climate of free debate at Sydney University in which all can participate without fear of intimidation?

I look forward to your response.

Best wishes,

Peter Baldwin

Published on the website of the ECAJ – EXECUTIVE COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIAN JEWRY .

Check Also

Zionist Federation of Australia: An historic day and an incredible peace.

The Zionist Federation of Australia warmly welcomes the signing of an Israel–UAE treaty and a …

5 comments

  1. What a wonderful, clearly articulated letter. Let’s hope that the Vice Chancellor does some soul searching and doesn’t just reply with the usual platitudes.

    As Mr Baldwin says, an educational establishment which tolerates such harrassment doesn’t deserve the term “university”, which connotes a certian grativas as a centre of learning.

    These totalitarian thugs who would deny freedom of speech to others should not be allowed on campus. I remember some years ago going to hear Daniel Pipes at the University of Melbourne, and his speech was drowned out by thugs like this. I was appalled that the University did nothing and it seems that nothing has changed.

    Harrassment is not freedom of speech, and preventing others from speakiing is definitely not freedom of speech. Time to prosecute these hoons and impose massive fines. Hit them and the whole Socialist Alternative mob with massive fines. That’s what they did to weaken the KKK, and these people are just as evil as the KKK.

  2. David Itzkowic

    I was present at Colonel Richard Kemp’s lecture. His description of events is accurate, except in that of Assoc Prof Lynch’s behaviour. Lynch tried to goad and intimidate an elderly woman sitting in the front row whilst holding a mobile phone in front of her. This was one of the most cowardly, disgusting acts I have ever witnessed.

    David Itzkowic

    • Thanks David
      I wish I’d known about it. I would have loved to have gone. I’ve followed Richard Kemp for years through Bicom, before he was known to the wider world.
      http://www.bicom.org.uk/

      Lynch is a disgrace and I have written about him in the past.

      Director of the Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies at the University of Sydney?
      Executive member of the Sydney Peace Foundation?
      Secretary general of the International Peace Research Association?

      Really !!!

  3. Caroline Berger

    “Harrassment is not freedom of speech, and preventing others from speaking is definitely not freedom of speech.”. Very well said, Pam!

    Jewish students should be able to attend university without fear of harassment and intimidation. And people should be able to speak and listen to speeches without animal behaviour from ignoramuses screeching and attacking.

    • Leon Poddebsky

      Caroline, in the totalitarian mentality, freedom of speech has a different meaning from the one that you and I know.
      Totalitarians speak a language that is known as Newspeak; so, e.g., war means peace.
      The baying mob of totalitarians at the Kemp talk referred to Israel’s alleged genocide.
      In 1967, when Israel assumed control of Gaza, its population was about 300,000; today it is about 2 million.
      In totalitarian Newspeak “genocide” means “exponential population growth.”

      That such idiocy abounds at The University of Sydney is evidence of the downward trajectory of education there, and that trajectory is part of The Peace Centre’s grand plan: if you “dumb down ” the populace, you make it so much easier to fool them into believing that Jake and his colleagues deserve to be chair-warmers like Karl Marx, who preached that the underlings must work, but their “betters” must not.
      By the way, did you know that one of Lynch’s confederates at the riot is another Syd Uni academic, one Dr Nicholas Riemer, senior lecturer in English, a male “of Jewish background.”