A Deeply Dishonest White House Denies that Kerry Said What Kerry Said.

Various sources are reporting that the White House is claiming that US Secretary of State John Kerry did not say what US Secretary of State John Kerry said.
In the Times of Israel we read:

The US State Department denied claims Friday that US Secretary of State John Kerry made statements on Thursday suggesting the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was fueling the spread of Islamic terror in the Middle East.

State Department Deputy Spokesperson Marie Harf told reporters:

“What [Kerry] said was that during his travels to build a coalition against the Islamic State, he was told that should the Israeli-Palestinian conflict be resolved, the Middle East would be a better place,” Harf said.

In other words what Ms. Harf is telling us is that we should have full faith that what we read and see is false, but what the administration tells us – all evidence directly to the contrary – is the truth.

This reminds me just a tad of how when the Obama administration was supporting the rise of radical Islam through supporting the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt some Obama sycophants told me with a straight face that Obama does not support radical Islam.

They said this as if, somehow, giving financial assistance and F-16 fighter jets with which to fight Israel to the parent organization of both Hamas and al-Qaeda does not represent support.

The imbecility of such a position boggles the mind.

In any case, what Kerry said was this:

“There wasn’t a leader I met with in the region who didn’t raise with me spontaneously the need to try to get peace between Israel and the Palestinians, because it was a cause of recruitment and of street anger and agitation that they felt –- and I see a lot of heads nodding –- they had to respond to,” he told gathered diplomats. 

“People need to understand the connection of that. 

If people need to understand the connection, or linkage, between the long Arab war against the Jews in the Middle East and the rise of political Islam, it means that John Kerry believes in the long discredited linkage theory that the administration sought to promote at Jewish expense.

This is not merely that others in the Middle East might blame the Jews for the rise of the Islamic State, but that Kerry, himself, is promoting the idea.  Ultimately what this means, obviously, is that the US is prepared to blame Israel for pretty much everything unless it capitulates to Arab demands, whatever those demands might be.  This despite the fact that it is the Arab majority that has always rejected yet another Arab state in Judea and Samaria.

Thus the Obama administration blames the Jews for pretty much everything going wrong throughout Arab political culture.  Jews are blamed not only for Arab intransigence on a “Palestinian” state in the Jewish heartland, but are also blamed ultimately for Arab head-chopping by the Islamic State.

For Obama’s Department of State to turn around and deny that Kerry claimed what we have him directly on record claiming is a deeply dishonest act from what is a truly insidious and dangerous administration for the well-being of Jewish people throughout the world.

The next time Kerry shows his face in Jerusalem his auto procession should be pelted with shoes by Jews and Arabs alike.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Published first at Israel Thrives

Check Also

The United Nations is Beyond Criminal Prosecution.

The United Nations may also be beyond repair. In May 2019, Robert Mueller, the Special …

4 comments

  1. Indeed, we have a lying, incompetent louse for a president. And the female variety waiting in the wings for her turn.

    • Jews Down Under

      Hi Dick

      Welcome ‘Down Under’

      I cannot believe that the American public were so blinded by their obsession to have Black President.

      I have friends in the US who are politically active, and who sent me so much information about him that I found it easy to come to the truth.

      Why was everything about him hushed up? It seems every court action brought against him was thrown out without a hearing?

  2. I don’t know of anything about him that was hushed up. The bad stuff was just pronounced irrelevant by such luminaries as the NYTimes and the rest of the media sheep went along, wagging their tails behind them. As they always do when a Democrat is in the White House. the old Newsweek sat on the Monica story until an unhappy staffer gave it to Drudge. With most of the big news media promoting Obama, his own party covering for him and the Republican party too cowardly (or corrupt) to do anything substantial (such as impeaching him), he rocks along and likely will for another few years. Just pray that he isn’t succeeded by you-know-who and her groper husband who can’t keep his fly zipped. These are not auspicious times for the US of A.