Palestinians: The Invented People.


“The history of the Palestinian people goes back as far as”… This is where Arab “historians” disagree.

Some say the “Palestinian people” have a proud 4000-year history; others say 10,000 years, 30,000 years, and even –don’t laugh- 200,000 years, which makes the Neanderthals pretty young people compared to the “mysterious Palestinians”. But although Arab historians do not agree on the “insignificant” details like the age of the “Palestinian people”, they do agree that this people is incredibly ancient-far more ancient than Jews, Romans or Greeks.

In the glorious history of the “Palestinian people”, there is only one “small” problem; nobody in history ever found them.


In 721 BCE, Assyria conquered the Kingdom of Israel. This is a historical fact nobody denies. Of course, the “Palestinian people” heroically fought against the aggressors and caused them heavy losses? Well, not exactly. Not a single Assyrian Chronicle, not even a single clay tablet, mentions this noble people. Could it be that hundreds of thousands of “Palestinians” were heroically fighting the Assyrian invaders – and these invaders did not even notice it? At the same time, those same Assyrian Chronicles are full of reports about the battles with the Israelis. So, Assyrians very well found Israelis, but did not notice any “Palestinians”?

Well, Assyrians did not notice any “Palestinian people”. Most probably, because the King Sargon II was a Zionist. And what about Babylonians? The same mystery awaits us when we start reading the Babylonian Chronicles about the conquest of the Kingdom of Judah between 597 and 582 BCE. Jews are there at every second page. And “Palestinians”? There is not a word about them. Babylonians did not find them, either.

But of course Persians found “Palestinians” and left to us the detailed description of this wonderful people, of its rich culture, interesting  habits, language…? Alas. They did not. The Persian Chronicles are telling us about Jews, about how Cyrus granted them the permission to return to Jerusalem, about how Persian satraps ruled in Judah and Israel… But about the “Palestinians” – not a word.

What makes the “quest to find Palestinians” even more amusing is that Alexander the Great passed all along the coast of Palestine from Tyre to Gaza in 332 – but did not find a single “Palestinian”: only Jews.

Where the heck did the “Palestinians” hide?

Well, OK, Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, even Alexander the Great: it was so long ago! But what about the scrupulous and methodical Romans? The same story.

Image result for Romans divided Judah and renamed it Palestine, about how they renamed Jerusalem in Aelia CapitolinaRomans explain in great detail how they were besieging Jerusalem, scrupulously informing us about how Jews were desperately defending it. They describe the Jewish revolts and how they quelled them and provide information about how Jews were fighting against them in Masada, about how Romans divided Judah and renamed it Palestine, about how they renamed Jerusalem in Aelia Capitolina…They tell us about a lot of things – but they do not say a single word about some “Palestinians”.

Moreover, although they renamed the land in “Palestine”, they went on calling its inhabitants as they were called for thousands of years: Jews. So, “Palestine” became the official name of the land, but its inhabitants remained Jews.

Just a moment, and where were the “Palestinian people” when Arabs came?

Its a million dollar question. Modern Arabs say they are “Palestinians”. And what did the Arabs of the 7th century, those who conquered Palestine, say about this?

Do you know any document written in the period of the Arab rule in Palestine that would say a word about some “Palestinians”? I do not. And nobody does, because such a document does not exist.

The situation becomes really amusing! Arabs today are foaming about how their forefathers lived in Palestine since the Time Immemorial, and their forefathers did not have any idea about their glorious and ancient past there.

Image result for Seljuks, Mamluks, Ottomans- the Turks ruled in Palestine for 600 yearsWell, after all, the Arab rule in Palestine did not last long. Just 300 years after the Arab conquest, Turks –first Mamluks and then Ottomans- threw them out. Under various names – Seljuks, Mamluks, Ottomans- the Turks ruled in Palestine for 600 years. Quite enough time to find such a numerous and glorious ethnic group as the “Palestinian people”. Did the Turks find them? Alas! The Turkish official statistics accurately puts the number of Jews, Arabs, Circassians and Bosnians in Palestine, providing detailed information about the number of Muslims, Christians and Jews – yet they never mention any “Palestinian people”.

Ok. Assyrians, Babylonians, Greeks, Romans, Persians and Arabs did not happen to notice any “Palestinian people”. Turks, in those 600 years they ruled in Palestine, did not find them either. And where was this incredibly ancient and unbelievingly heroic people hiding after 1917? The numerous League of Nations Commissions (later UN Commissions) did not find them; all the League of Nations documents of that period are only about Jews and Arabs, but there is not a word about any “Palestinians” as a separate people.

Maybe the politicians of the Western countries talked about “Palestinians” then? No, they did not.

Delegates from 11 nations went to the area and found what had long been apparent: two conflicting groups, Arabs and Jews, whose national aspirations could not be reconciled. “Palestinians”? Who are they?

But the politicians of the Arab counties, of course… Alas. The politicians of the Arab countries were very clear on this subject.

“We consider Palestine as part of Arab Syria, as it has never been separated from it at any time. We are connected with it by national, religious, linguistic, natural, economic and geographical bonds.” (First Congress of Muslim-Christian Associations, February 1919)

The representative of the Arab Higher Committee to the United Nations submitted a statement to the General Assembly in May 1947 that said,

“Palestine was part of the Province of Syria,” and that, “politically, the Arabs of Palestine were not independent in the sense of forming a separate political entity.”

In 1937, a local Arab leader, Auni Bey Abdul-Hadi, told the Peel Commission, which ultimately suggested the partition of Palestine:

“There is no such country as Palestine! ‘Palestine’ is a term the Zionists invented! There is no Palestine in the Bible. Our country was for centuries part of Syria.”

“Palestine and Transjordan are one.”

King Abdullah, Arab League meeting in Cairo,12 April 1948

So the Arabs in the 1940s did not notice any “Palestinians”. Moreover, they did not “notice” any “Palestine” either!

OK. In the 40s, the Arab politicians did not find any “Palestinian people”. It’s no surprise; nobody could find them.

But maybe they “found” this mysterious “Palestinian people” later? They did not.

Syrian President Hafez Assad addressing the Palestinian leader, the Chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), President of the Palestinian National Authority (PNA) and “Father of the Palestinian People” Yasser Arafat, explained to him:

“You do not represent Palestine as much as we do. Never forget this one point: There is no such thing as a Palestinian people, there is no Palestinian entity, there is only Syria. You are an integral part of the Syrian people, Palestine is an integral part of Syria. Therefore it is we, the Syrian authorities, who are the true representatives of the Palestinian people.”

Of course, the Palestinian leader, “Father of the Palestinian People” and so on, rejected these insinuations with indignation and… Actually, no, he did not.

Moreover, Arafat himself made a definitive and unequivocal statement along the same lines as late as 1993, when he declared that,

“The question of borders doesn’t interest us… From the Arab standpoint, we mustn’t talk about borders. Palestine is nothing but a drop in an enormous ocean. Our nation is the Arabic nation that stretches from the Atlantic Ocean to the Red Sea and beyond it…The P.L.O. is fighting Israel in the name of Pan-Arabism. What you call “Jordan” is nothing more than Palestine.”

Not long ago, Azmi Bishara (the ex-Knesset member exiled from Israel for passing sensitive information to Hezbollah during the Second Lebanon War) who is anything except Israel’s friend said the same: there is no Palestinian people.

“The truth is that Jordan is Palestine and Palestine is Jordan.”

– King Hussein of Jordan, in 1981

“Palestine is Jordan and Jordan is Palestine; there is only one land, with one history and one and the same fate,”

Prince Hassan of the Jordanian National Assembly was quoted as saying on February 2, 1970.

Abdul Hamid Sharif, Prime Minister of Jordan declared in 1980,

“The Palestinians and Jordanians do not belong to different nationalities. They hold the same Jordanian passports, are Arabs and have the same Jordanian culture.”

But the Arabs, who lived in Palestine since, as they assure us, the Time Immemorial, of course did not let Syrian and Jordanian dictators deprive them of their proud Palestinian past? You will be surprised, but they let them. And they had very serious reasons for this.

Do you know that until 1950, the name of the Jerusalem Post was THE PALESTINE POST?

That the journal of the Zionist Organization of America was NEW PALESTINE?

That the Bank Leumi’s original name was the ANGLO-PALESTINE BANK?


That the Israel Electric Company’s original name was the PALESTINE ELECTRIC COMPANY?


And all these were JEWISH ORGANIZATIONS, organized and run by JEWS.

In America, the Anthem of the Zionist youngsters sang “PALESTINE, MY PALESTINE”, “PALESTINE SCOUT SONG” and “PALESTINE SPRING SONG”.

Until the mid/late 60s, to call an Arab a “Palestinian” would mean to insult him because until the mid/late 60s, the word “Palestinian” was commonly and unanimously associated in all the world with Jews, and the entire world knew: Palestine is just another name for Israel and Judah, like for example Kemet was just another ancient name for Egypt. Arabs who lived in Palestine identified themselves as Arabs and were insulted when someone called them “Palestinians”: we are not Jews, we are Arabs, and they used to respond.

Let’s Set Things Straight

There is a country in the Far East. The people who live there, (and they have lived in this country for many centuries), poetically called it “The Land Of The Rising Sun”. Then the Western travelers and geographers came to this country and gave it another name. Why? Maybe they were not poets, or maybe they came there on the sunset, or maybe they could not pronounce the original name in the original language… Did the people who lived there change because Western travelers and then politicians and journalists started to call their country by another name? No. They were those same people and they went on calling their country “The Land Of The Rising Sun”.

And the West calls it Japan.

There is a country in the Middle East. The people who lived there for many centuries called it “Eretz Israel”- The Land of Israel. Then the people from the West came- and gave to it another name. Did the people who lived there change? No. They were those same people and they went on calling their country “The Land of Israel”.

And the West calls it Palestine.

The website which published this article originally is no longer in existence.


Check Also

Opinion | Time for the UN to rethink Palestine

The United Nations and various member states are poised to revisit the question of Palestine …


  1. Michael Lumish

    The most significant mistake that Israel ever made was recognizing an allegedly distinct ethnicity known as “Palestinian.”

    That one huge mistake made all the difference.

    Here is a question, just when did that term become commonplace within the Israeli government to refer to local Arabs?

    Mid-late 70s?

  2. The “Palestinian” flag design is the same as the flag of the failed union of Jordan and Iraq called the Arab Federation.

  3. This is a brilliant fraud, flawlessly executed, accepted by too many people. We can’t put the toothpaste back into the tube. Thank G-d there is the Jewish State of Israel, Am Yisrael Chai now and forever

  4. Pity that the new state didn’t keep the name in 1948. Or just called the place West Palestine.

    Then Jordan would be East Palestine, the West Bank would be Central Palestine, Gaza would be SW Palestine.

    Then the Palestinian refugees would nearly all be living in a place called Palestine.

    And everything would be alright – wouldn’t it?

    • Not sure if you are serious or playing ‘silly buggers’

      It was always Israel.

      Remember Moses and the ‘Children of Israel’ who were slaves to the Egyptians?

    • Jim has a point, Shirlee.

      The terms that we use make all the difference in the world.

      At this point, I actually recommend not using the “P-word” at all, if one can help it.

      I avoid it as much as possible and when I do use it, it is always in quotes.

      The reason for this is because the Jewish people are under no ethical obligation to recognize an allegedly distinct ethnicity that only came into being within living memory strictly for the purpose of challenging Jewish rights to Jewish land.

      Had there been no Zionism there would have been no “Palestinian” people, period.

      I don’t know that we can put the toothpaste back into the tube, but one thing is certain.

      We have no use for the toothpaste at all, so why bother with it?

      • The problem with the name given to the ‘invented people’ – as I call them – is that we accepted the term all too readily.

        On June 4th 1967 when they started using the name, we shouldn’t have just accepted it. Now it’s a huge task removing it from our vocabulary. It now rolls too easily off the tongue.

        I do note however that more and more people are now referring to the Arabs in Gaza as Gazans.

        I now call them in Judaea and Samaria – Arabs or the ‘invented people’

        In referring to Judaea and Samaria, I call it that, sometimes if really necessary I will call it ‘the West Bank of Jordan’.

        That’s another mistake we made.

  5. Eminent Middle East historian Bernard Lewis…

    “The adjective Palestinian is comparatively new. This, I need hardly remind you, is a region of ancient civilization and of deep-rooted and often complex identities. But Palestine was not one of them.

    People might identify themselves for various purposes, by religion, by descent or by allegiance to a particular state or ruler, or sometimes locality. But when they did it locally it was generally either the city and immediate district or the larger province, so they would have been Jerusalemites or Jaffaites, or Syrians, identifying with the larger province of Syria, in Classical Arabic usage, Sham.

    The constitution or the formation of a political entity called palestine which eventually gave rise to a nationality called palestinian, were lasting innovations of the British Mandate (1918-1948)

    Interestingly, during the period of the British Mandate, that is, until 1948, the terms “Palestine” and “Palestinian” were primarily used by Jews, not by Arabs. They were not happy with these terms, but at least they designated the country as a historically separate entity.

    Overwhelmingly, the Arabs rejected this name which they saw, not unreasonably, as a British imperialist device to slice off a part of the greater Arab homeland.

    After the war which followed the termination of the British Mandate in 1948, much of mandatory Palestine was held by the Jews, who decided to adopt the ancient name Israel.”

  6. Renowned archaeologist, anthropologist & historian Eric Cline…

    “Historians & archaeologists have generally concluded that most, if not all, modern palestinians are probably more closely related to the Arabs of Saudi Arabia, Yemen & other countries than they are to the ancient Philistines. The major movements of those Arabs into the region occurred after 600 CE, more than 1600 years after the Israelites had vanquished the original inhabitants of the land.

    In 1997, Rashid Khalidi, then professor of Middle East history and director of the Center for International Studies at the University of Chicago, put it bluntly: “There is a relatively recent tradition which argues that Palestinian nationalism has deep historic roots. As with other national movements, extreme advocates of this view anachronistically read back into the history of Palestine over the past few centuries, and even millennia, a nationalist consciousness and identity that are in fact relatively modern. Among the manifestations of this outlook are a…predilection for seeing in peoples such as the Philistines the lineal ancestors of the modern Palestinians”

  7. An excerpt from

    “… Yet curiously, when it comes to giving the history of this ?ancient? people most news outlets find it harder to go back more than the early nineteen hundreds. CNN, an agency which has devoted countless hours of airtime to the ?plight? of the Palestinians, has a website which features a special section on the Middle East conflict called ?Struggle For Peace?. It includes a promising sounding section entitled ?Lands Through The Ages? which assures us it will detail the history of the region using maps. Strangely, it turns out, the maps displayed start no earlier than the ancient date of 1917. The CBS News website has a background section called ?A Struggle For Middle East Peace.?? Its history timeline starts no earlier than 1897. The NBC News background section called ??Searching for Peace?? has a timeline which starts in 1916. BBC?s timeline starts in 1948.

    Yet, the clincher must certainly be the Palestinian National Authority?s own website. While it is top heavy on such phrases as ?Israeli occupation? and ?Israeli human rights violations? the site offers practically nothing on the history of the so-called Palestinian people. The only article on the site with any historical content is called ?Palestinian History – 20th Century Milestones? which seems only to confirm that prior to 1900 there was no such concept as the Palestinian People…”

  8. All the above comments are germane. They are also preaching to the choir. The point is: how to deal with the idea the world has accepted?