The Nazis and the Palestinian Movement

By Francisco Gil-White…Traces the history of PLO/Fatah, now better known as the ‘Palestinian Authority,’ the organization that will govern a future Palestinian State. The video shows how PLO/Fatah emerged from the German Nazi Final Solution. Hajj Amin al Husseini, father of the Palestinian Movement, creator of Fatah, and mentor to Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas, was co-director with Adolf Eichmann of the death camp system that exterminated between 5 and 6 million European Jews in WWII.
___________________________________________________________

Hajj Amin al Husseini is the father of the Palestinian Movement. He created PLO/Fatah (now better known as the ‘Palestinian Authority’), the organization that will govern any future Palestinian state. And he was mentor to Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas, the leaders of that organization. Husseini was also, during World War II, a top Nazi leader who co-directed with Adolf Eichmann the death camp system that murdered between 5 and 6 million European Jews, also known as the Final Solution. These facts are not widely known or understood. Neither has their implication for our understanding of Israeli ruling elite behavior been properly appreciated. We present a short documentary and a discussion.

Historical and Investigative Research – 26 July 2013
by Francisco Gil-White
http://www.hirhome.com/israel/nazis_palestinians.htm

Check Also

joining terror organizations

A day of pity.

 I think it is time to have pity, as they say in Yiddish, rachmunas, for …

6 comments

  1. These historical facts comprise a very inconvenient truth which the world does not want exposed.

    Mahmoud Abbas must be made to appear the innocent victim of the Zionist oppressor, who desperately wants peaceful coexistence, but is prevented by Israeli intransigence. Plus of course the settlements – Jews living in their ancestral homeland!

    The reality is that Arafat, and now Abbas, are following in Husseini’s footsteps with their vitriolic anti-Semitism and desire to rid the world of Jews. Remember that the subject of Abbas’ PhD was Holocaust denial.

  2. Israeli-imposed restrictions on Palestinians in the Palestinian West Bank impede easy access to fertile farmland and other resources, costing the Palestinians $3.4 billion a year, according to a new World Bank study. This land falls in Area C, which the Israelis agreed to turn over to the Palestinian Authority by 1998. They never did so, and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahoo was caught on camera boasting that he had derailed these Oslo agreements. Instead, Israel has flooded hundreds of thousands of squatters onto Palestinian land in a naked grab of property from the stateless, helpless Palestinians. Palestinians suffering under Israeli Apartheid are cut up into Bantustans by a network of roads and checkpoints and cannot move freely through the West Bank.

    • The area might be fertile, but your mind is more so. Oslo II provided that Area C be turned over to the local Arabs – those who followed KGB suggestions and termed themselves “Palestinian” – following negotiation. Oslo II also provided that disputes be settled by negotiations. The Arab negotiations became intifadas I & II. So what you are proposing, David, is that Israel just walks away from agreements and surrender to Arab demands accompanied by violence. The Accords, sealed, signed and delivered called for mutual recognition by both parties. The good faith of the Arabs has repeatedly been shown by their repudiation of their recognition of Israel as the state of the Jewish people and of course, their declaration that in a future “Palestine” there will be no Jews. Your weeping for the murderous aggressors and your false description of Israel as an apartheid state rules you out of any serious debate. Keep your antisemitic rants for your like minded fact defying supporters of the perpetual whiners ruled over by thieves and terrorists who steal the funds meant for development. And just a teeny-wheeny question: how come those fertile lands need development now? They were left fallow when Jews were not there, because they didn’t have the initiative to make the land bloom as did the Jewish pioneers of the kibbutzim and the moshavim..

    • Leon Poddebsky

      The Arabs of The Land of Israel, who call themselves “Palestinians” are lucky that their chosen enemy are the Jews: given the behaviour of many of them, any other nation would treat them far more stringently.
      The “Palestinians” are their own worst enemies, however: they wish to deprive the Jewish nation of its inalienable historical, natural and legal rights, and they use murder, subterfuge and mendacity as part of their arsenal.
      The “Palestinians” believe that to slit the throats of Jewish babies is one of their human rights.
      They are strengthened in this belief by the support which they receive from Westerners like blog posters who either don’t know the facts, or who don’t like Jews and think they have found a stick with which to beat Jews.
      From day one of Oslo, the Arabs violated it; Yasser Arafat, winner of the Nobel Disgrace Prize, called Oslo the “Palestinian” Trojan horse, and that’s exactly what it was.
      Well, Ariel Sharon eventually tamed that horse, and that’s what infuriates certain Westerners: imagine the arrogance of those Jews: they actually try to stop “Palestinians” from murdering them. Even George Bush junior eventually saw through them when they did the dirty on him by trying to smuggle a shipload of banned arms in the “Karine A”.
      Westerners like certain strident blog posters become conditioned to expecting Jews to be blown up in buses, cafes, universities and so on. These posters see in the “Palestinians” their own proxy murderers of Jews.
      That era has long gone, Daoud…er… David. You can forget about it.
      No “Balestinian” is going to deprive us of our legal, moral, historical rights.
      Ariel Sharon told George Bush, ” Israel is not, and will not be Czechoslovakia.”
      George was offended by this comment- how dare a Jew tell him that he would not capitulate to the keffyiah-wearing nazis of the Middle East! Well, George soon learnt about them on his own turf.
      The “Palestinians” have for more than a century deprived the Jews of The Land of the basic birthright of any human: to live a normal life in peace and security. “Palestinian” barbarity and racist, imperialist lust for Israel’s land, have forced the latter to divert scarce resources to defence rather than constructive projects, while the “Palestinians”, who are per capita the recipients of the largest donations of international aid, abuse it for projects such as homicide belts, rockets and nazi indoctrination of their children, who are taught never to make peace with “the offspring of apes and pigs.” Then they cry poor.
      The “Palestinian” myth factory churns out the biggest confidence tricks ever perpetrated, and in the West they have many willing believers.

      • David Atkins where you get your misinformation?

        My question is ‘have you been to Judaea and Samaria’?

        I doubt it. It is a dry barren, rocky and pretty dusty place, hardly “fertile farmland”
        I suggest you read Mark Twain’s “Innocents Abroad” A free download is available here http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3176

        When he visited the Holy Land in the 19th century, he was very disappointed. He didn’t see many people. He referred to it as a vast wasteland. The land we now know as Israel was practically deserted.

        “…..a silent mournful expanse…. a desolation…. we never saw a human being on the whole route…. hardly a tree or shrub anywhere. Even the olive tree and the cactus, those fast friends of a worthless soil, had almost deserted the country.”

        I would add here that the Arabs are forever claiming “Settlers destroy their olives trees which, they claim, 100s of years old” BTW there is video evidence available showing that they do this themselves,
        As far as I know the Oslo Accords are still very much in place, due to the fact the Arab leadership has made no effort at all to abide by any of its decisions. The biggest is their failure to hold elections and we have Abu Mazen firmly clinging on to power, when he is long past the end of his Presidency

        http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/21/opinion/israel-should-annul-the-oslo-accords.html?_r=0

        “stateless, helpless Palestinians” ??
        It is no one’s fault unfortunately but their own. Their leaders have consistently let them down by refusing to come to the table for talks.

        1948, Israel proclaimed independence. Arabs choose war rather than accept the partition of Palestine between its Jewish and Arab populations. Five armies attacked the fledgling State of Israel. 6,373 Israelis were killed but despite that they were triumphant.

        1967 Israel offered to relinquish the land for peace with its neighbours, the response issued at a summit in Khartoum, was not one NO, but three:

        “No peace with Israel, no negotiations with Israel, no recognition of Israel.’’

        2000 Camp David offered Arabs a sovereign state with shared control of Jerusalem and billions of dollars compensation for Arab refugees. Arafat refused the offer, instead launched the deadly terror war known as the Second Intifada.

        2008 Olmert offered Abbas a peace agreement that would have guaranteed a Palestinian state in virtually all Judaea, Samaria, and Gaza, also part of Jerusalem.

        Once again, the Palestinians turned down the offer.

        1.8% of the land in Judaea and Samaria is not a “a naked grab of property”
        Settlers in areas B and C have every right to be there.
        The land belongs to no one except Israel.
        The Arabs didn’t claim that land in 1948.
        Jordan took that land in the war of ’48.
        Israel took it in 1967

        Check out UN Resolution 242. Check out the Terms of the Mandate for Palestine. I am sure you have heard the ‘war cry’ of the BDS movement from racist antisemites “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free”. It’s a play on words. The “Mandate for Palestine,” an historical League of Nations document, laid down the Jewish legal right to settle anywhere in western Palestine, between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, an entitlement unaltered in international law.

        Heard of the ‘West Bank’ or the West bank of Jordan, to differentiate it from Jordan proper. When the Soviets wrote the preamble for the PLO, they coined the term Palestine. They even had a flag. They took the Jordanian flag, removed the star and so the flag for the fictitious State of Palestine came into being.

  3. David Atkins simply reproduces farcical figures traded by B’Tselem and endorsed by the World Bank as projected, possible, figures relative to situations NOT present on the ground.

    Apart from the fact that this thread is dealing with an entirely distinct issue, that of the Nazi inspired antisemitic policies of the Arabs inhabiting traditional Jewish land, Atkins seems delighted by the airing of simple lies, “facts” and figures which have only a prejudiced propagandist function.

    The so called some 3.4 billion dollars “losses” by an Arab populace is but another hyperbolic tactic in an attempt to deligitimise everything Israel is attempting to achieve in bringing its neighbours to a modicum of civilised behaviour.

    Now, about Area C. I proudly said it before reading what Naftali Bennett proposed, that this Jewish land called Area C should be annexed to Israel as we know it today, making it more the Israel we have known for close to 4,000years.

    Also, in very simple terms, most of the non Jews in area C causing real administrative problems are Bedouins, known for their propensity for dealing with reality their own idiosyncratic way. As such, this is not at all anybody else’s business but Israel’s and Bedouin’s and there seems to be some progress there anyway.

    In realistic terms, at this juncture, Israel should treat agreements of the Oslo I or II kind with the same respect and deference ( read defiance ) as its immediate counterparts.

    If the Arabs replied to Oslo with a couple of intifadas, meaning that the choice of force is the MO in implementing “agreements”, guess what, Arabs do NOT have a monopoly on resorting to physical means.

    Jews, contrary to the millenia old belief, are quite capable to retort forcefully to actions directed at hurting them. David Atkins and his Arab mates – and a few Jewish idiots, such as B’Tselem – should have gotten used to this notion.

    What, did Israel win ALL aggressive encounters against her for nothing !!!???
    No, and one of the inevitability of the Jewish temerity and skill in beating the shit out of those still having a go at them, is that, he who wins a “contest”, call it war if you wish, keeps the trophy. It’s perfect ,Jewish as well, cricket, like it or not.

    Now, if the Arabs want a state of their own on Jewish land, they will get

    Paul Winter is also, as usual, impeccable in his argument.